🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good first step," said a leading parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust data".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local government level amid national stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further states are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

Even as this international conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.